Monday, December 5, 2011

Always Learning

It had been a while since I played any tournament poker, so the day before Thanksgiving I went up the hill with a buddy to jump into a daily donkament. I use that term affectionately, but with a $60 buy-in, 20 minute levels, 8,000 in starting chips, a $10 dealer add-on for 5,000 chips and basically a who's-who of local poker players who are just killing time, it amounts to nothing more than a non-deepstack semi-turbo. But, it's a nice daily tournament in a clean poker room with competent dealers in the box.

However, this story isn't about tournament structures or even me winning the damn thing. This is a story about learning more about myself, a goal I have for every session I play whether it's cash or tournament. The only way I'll get better as a player is to learn more every time I sit down at a table.

The bonus chips we received at the beginning of the tournament allowed me to play around a little more in the early stages than I usually do. And based on what I learned, I think I know why the pros like deep structures in tournaments.

At 25/50, an older gentleman in early position raised to 200. Two players called the raise and I joined them with K4hh, my thinking being that if the flop hit me hard it would be well-disguised, and if it didn't I could get out relatively cheaply.

The flop came 10JQ rainbow, but one heart. The old man led out for 400 and the first two callers folded. I called. I could run through the math to rationalize my decision, but I just wanted to see a turn card. And I didn't like the way the old man looked at me.

The turn was a Q and the old man checked to me. At this point, if I'd had my druthers, I probably should have bet, repping the Q. As it was, I was happy to see a free river.

The river came 9, making my straight. He bet, I raised, he said "You got there, did ya'?" and called. I was a little sheepish to turn my hand over, but I had the nuts, so whatever. He looked disgustedly at me, flipping over one of his cards, a jack, and mumbling something sarcastically about a nice call.

I learned two things on this hand: 1) The old man was willing to bet and call all the way down with 2nd pair, and 2) I had tilted him.

A few hands later I chased a flush draw against the old man and folded on the river when I didn't get there. This time he said very audibly to the player next to him, "See? He just chases everything." At that moment I made a conscious decision to play off of that table image, to run a long-bluff.

Not too long after, I ran a "fake chase" against the old man. I played the hand as if I was on a draw, and would have bet the crap out of it had it hit on the river, but it missed and I folded. However, not three hands later, I played a hand that was perfect for the set-up that had been happening.

The old man had been getting frustrated and, with blinds at 100/200, snap-raised from early position to 700. It folded around to me where I found JJ in my hand. I took this opportunity to play off the table image I had established, especially in his eyes, and I just called. Everyone else folded. The flop was all low. He checked the flop, I bet "on the come", he raised, I called. The turn was another number, he bet, I called. The river paired the board. He bet and I moved all-in. He snap called and flipped over his pocket 10s, thinking I had moved in on a busted draw. He actually cursed when I turned over my JJ for the winning hand. He couldn't believe that I had "woken up" with a real hand. I now had the table chip lead and felt like I had complete control over the table.

This was the first time I had stayed focus enough in a tournament to really be able to gauge how other people viewed me, and I was immediately rewarded because of it. It was nice to be able to add another weapon to my arsenal at the poker table and move on from simply "can my cards beat their cards." I'll look forward to playing in tournaments in the future that have a little "deeper" structure so I can continue to use my table image to my advantage.

2 comments:

  1. First hand with the "older gentleman," you had a straight. The second best straight at that. "The nuts" would have been pocket Queens (for Quads). Then QJ, Q10, Q9, JJ, 1010, 99 for full houses. Then broadway, then the king high straight.

    The nuts does not refer to the winning hand but best possible hand. Don't close your mind to the best possible hands because many a player lost with "the nuts," being unaware of the real meaning.

    BTW I enjoy your blog, not dogging you, just trying to help what can be a hole in your game.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your comment is the nuts. That was probably more of a hole in my description of the hand than it is a hole in my game. But I do appreciate the insight. I'll definitely make sure that when I refer to something as the nuts it actually is. Thanks for reading!

    ReplyDelete